The code you suggested did not produce a different effect. However, the 2 suggestions at the link you provided each produced segmentation faults for some reason.
I think it might help to recap where I am up to :
I can now get acceptable video - I do this by running the long command to launch VLC and then a secondary short command to switch to composite video. With the VLC record function I can get a decent copy of the footage saved to HDD.
So, all that is missing now is the audio. , as previously mentioned, the card is detected as
card 1: U0xeb1a0x2861 [USB Device 0xeb1a:0x2861], device 0: USB Audio [USB Audio]
Subdevices: 1/1
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
when I run
arecord -l
when I run
arecord-l
It is also detected as an audio capture device in the kde system settings
Because of this I am feeling that this could simply be simply down to the name that is used either by the system or by vlc for the card (or the syntax I am putting in). In that respect I have found this
http://forum.videolan.org/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=90289
Does that seem like the right way to be going? Would I be right is assuming that if I was slotting this into the long command I would simply switch
:v4l-adev="/dev/audio2"
with
v4l2:// :input-slave=alsa://plughw:0,0
or as the card is seen as card 1 device 0 should it be
v4l2:// :input-slave=alsa://plughw:1,0
Or should it be
v4l2:// :input-slave=“alsa://plughw:1,0”
(the reference by the vlc developer to not quoting the command line correctly)
I also note that in the code at the ubuntu help page the only reference to v4l2 is at the start of the command - all other references are simply to v4l. Is that relevant?
Sorry to ramble but this seems so near but yet so far :( I'm beginning to wonder whether I would be better buying a VCR/DVDR combo instead :)
Thanks