but they should be on the NHS and probably better made than the average smartphone.
Mmm, if you’ve seen the NHS in the news recently, in my experience, the issues have probably been understated!
- do it yourself first, then use the NHS if you have to, because otherwise, 9 times out of 10, they’re not going give a s**t about you!
Nice soundbite .. but plainly not true .. in the VAST majority of cases they've made people LESS productive (spending more time telling people what tey had for breakfast on twitter) .. I'm assuming you were alive when you bought one .. and I still think they are (currently) creating nothing more than a "perceived" need, and more work.
Mmm, I think I used “I” rather than “everyone” (!)
By survive, I mean maintain my current meagre existence by earning a little money and eating.
If I had no phone I would be tied to a desk, unable to take a break, rest or Holiday - without risking the business.
Back in the good old days before phones, I had to employ people to sit in an office and field queries for when I wasn’t available - now, not only can’t I get or afford the expertise, the level of query they would need to field just makes it impractical.
Instead I would have to get a job or contract … but then it would be sysadmin or devops and I would be on call … and they wouldn’t employ me if I didn’t use a mobile if I wasn’t available out of hours. Which means that to be realistic, I wouldn’t be able to work without a phone, either for myself or anyone else … so … plainly “true” ??
- I worked a contact last summer (devops) , probably received ~ 100 messages per day between 6pm and 9am, maybe 3-4 a week were critical and needed immediate attention. If I had to power up a Laptop to see each message … well … “impractical”.